For Libraries For Publication Downloads News About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Precipitation Hardening in Al-Cu-Mg Alloys: Analysis of Precipitates, Modelling of Kinetics, Strength Predictions
p.251
Crystal Analysis of Nonequilibrium δnon-Phase in Al-Li-Mg Alloys
p.259
Nature of Formation of the Areas Having an Ultrafine Grain Structure in Al-Li-Mg System Alloys
p.265
Through Process Modelling of Microchemistry in AA3103
p.271
A Multi-Mechanistic Model for Precipitation Strengthening in Al-Cu-Mg Alloys during Non-Isothermal Heat Treatments
p.277
Secondary Precipitation in Aluminium Alloys & Its Role in Modern Heat Treatment
p.283
Cluster Dynamics Modelling of the Precipitation Kinetics in Al(ZrSc) Alloys
p.291
Modelling the Phase Transformation from Al6(Mn,Fe) to α-Al(Mn,Fe)Si Phase during Homogenization of AA3xxx Alloys
p.297
Characterisation of AlFeSi Intermetallics in 6000 Series Aluminium Alloy Extrusions
p.303

A Multi-Mechanistic Model for Precipitation Strengthening in Al-Cu-Mg Alloys during Non-Isothermal Heat Treatments

Article Preview

Abstract:

A multi-mechanistic model for microstructure development and strengthening during nonisothermal treatment of precipitation strengthened Al-Cu-Mg based alloys is derived. The formation kinetics of the precipitates is modelled using the Kampmann and Wagner numerical model that accounts for complete transformation from the nucleation to the coarsening stages. The increase in critical resolved shear strength of the grains due to the precipitates is based on two mechanisms i.e. the modulus strengthening mechanism for the shearable Cu:Mg co-clusters and the Orowan strengthening mechanism for the non-shearable S phase precipitates. The contributions due to solute and dislocation strengthening are also included in the strength calculations. The model is verified by comparing the predicted results with differential scanning calorimetery and hardness data on 2024 aluminium alloys. The microstructural development and strength/hardness predictions of the model are in reasonable agreement with the experimental data and the differences are discussed in terms of requirements for further model development.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Aluminium Alloys 2006 - ICAA10 View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 519-521)

Pages:

277-282

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.277

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2006

Authors:

I.N. Khan, Marco J. Starink

Keywords:

AA2024 Aluminium Alloy, Modeling, Non-Isothermal, Precipitation Strengthening

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] B.B. Verma, J.D. Atkinson and M. Kumar: Bull. Mater. Sci., Vol. 24 (2001), p.231.

Google Scholar

[2] K. Raviprasad, C.R. Hutchinson, T. Sakurai, S.P. Ringer: Acta Mater., Vol. 51 (2003), p.5037.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Liu, G.J. Zhang, X.D. Ding, J. Sun, K.H. Chen: Mater. Sci. Engg. A, Vol. 344 (2003), p.113.

Google Scholar

[4] M.J. Starink and J. Yan: Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on Metall. Modelling for Al. Alloys, ASM Materials Solution 2003, Pittsburgh, USA, October 12-15 (2003), p.119.

Google Scholar

[5] S.C. Wang and M.J. Starink: Int. Mater. Review, Vol. 50 (2005), p.193.

Google Scholar

[6] S.P. Ringer, K. Hono, T. Sakurai and I.J. Polmear: Scripta Mater., Vol. 36 (1997), p.517.

Google Scholar

[7] S.C. Wang, M.J. Starink and N. Gao: Scr. Mater., Vol. 54 (2006), p.287.

Google Scholar

[8] S.P. Ringer, K. Hono, I.J. Polmear and T. Sakurai: Appl. Surface Sci., Vol. 94-95 (1996), p.253.

Google Scholar

[9] R. Wagner and R. Kampmann, in Mater. Sci. Tech.: A Comprehensive Treat.: Phase Transf. in Mater., Ed. by R. Cahn, P. Haasen and E.J. Kramer, Wiley-VCH, Vol. 5 (1990), p.215.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Deschamps and Y. Brechet: Acta Mater., Vol. 47 (1999), p.293.

Google Scholar

[11] J.D. Robson: Acta Mater., Vol. 52 (2004), p.1409.

Google Scholar

[12] A.W. Zhu and E.A. Starke: Acta Mater., Vol. 47 (1999), p.3263.

Google Scholar

[13] H. R. Shercliff and M.F. Ashby: Acta Metall. Mater., Vol. 38 (1990), p.1789.

Google Scholar

[14] M. F. Ashby: Phil. Mag., Vol. 14 (1966), p.1157.

Google Scholar

[15] M.J. Starink and S.C. Wang: Acta Mater., Vol. 51 (2003), p.5131.

Google Scholar

[16] E. Nembach: Acta Mater., Vol. 40 (1992), p.3325.

Google Scholar

[17] B. Clausen, T. Lorentzen and T. Leffers: Acta Mater., Vol. 46 (1998), p.3087.

Google Scholar

[18] M.J. Starink, I. Sinclair, N. Gao, N. Kamp, P.J. Gregson, P.D. Pitcher, A. Levers and S. Gardiner: Mater. Sci. Forum, Vol. 396-402 (2002), p.601.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.396-402.601

Google Scholar

[19] M.J. Starink: Int. Mater. Rev., Vol. 49 (2004), p. (1916).

Google Scholar

[20] M.J. Starink, N. Gao and J.L. Yan: Mater. Sci. Engg. A, Vol. 387-389 (2004), p.222.

Google Scholar

[21] N. Gao, L. Davin, S. Wang, A. Cerezo and M.J. Starink, Mater. Sci. Forum, Vol. 396-402 (2002), p.923.

Google Scholar

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open access content, terms of the Creative Commons licensing CC-BY are applied.
Scientific.Net is a registered trademark of Trans Tech Publications Ltd.