Effect of Lubricant Volume and Working Gap on the Surface Roughness and Material Removal Rate in Magnetic Abrasive Finishing

Mehrdad Vahdati; E. Sadeghinia; Ali Shokuhfar

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.297-301.390

Paper Titles

Mechanical Performance of the Annealed NiTi Shape Memory Alloy Coating onto 316L Stainless Bio-Steel
p.365

Characterization of the Intermetallic Compounds Formed during Hot Dipping of Electrical Steel in a Hypo-Eutectic Al-Si Bath
p.370

Phase-Field Simulation on Coarsening of the γ'Phase Particles in Ni-Based Superalloys Considering Elastic Inhomogeneity
p.376

Diffusion of Ti, V and Nb in Ni₃Al at Elevated Temperatures
p.384

Effect of Lubricant Volume and Working Gap on the Surface Roughness and Material Removal Rate in Magnetic Abrasive Finishing
p.390

Air Characteristics in Air Turbine Spindle of Ultra Precision Machines
p.396

Magnetic Assisted Abrasion, a New Method for Nano Level Surface Finishing
p.402

Fluid Flow in Tree-Shaped Constructal Networks: Porosity, Permeability and Inertial Parameter
p.408

Unifying Theory for Natural and Man-Made Flow Systems: an Application to Design of Porous Material for Particulate Control
p.413

HomeDefect and Diffusion ForumDefect and Diffusion Forum Vols. 297-301Effect of Lubricant Volume and Working Gap on the...

Effect of Lubricant Volume and Working Gap on the Surface Roughness and Material Removal Rate in Magnetic Abrasive Finishing

Abstract:

Technological requirements urges high technology industries using materials with advanced properties. Although it is compulsory using these materials due to their advantages, some of them should be tolerated because of their weak machining and mechanical properties. Attempts for qualitative machining of complex curves on many work pieces may result in the advent of new finishing techniques. One of the most newly introduced techniques is Magnetic Abrasive Finishing, MAF. In this paper a study on the effects of tool and work piece gap, and lubricant volume, on the roughness and material removal rate have been studied. The results show that setting the working gap to 3 mm and the lubricant volume to 0.7 ml, yields a change in surface roughness (Ra), and the material removal (MR) will gain its best result.