Optimization of Laser Peening Parameters Using Taguchi Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Using Taguchi method to optimize the critical parameters of laser peening (LP) is presented firstly. The objective of the study is to assess the impact of laser parameters on the laser peen strengthening for the 6061-T6 aluminum alloy and optimize the process parameters to achieve higher surface residual compressive stress. In order to reduce the process cost and time, the finite element method was applied to simulate the LP process. The Taguchi method is used to formulate the experimental layout and establish the order of predominance among the identified critical parameters, and predict the optimal setting for each process parameter. The results show that three parameters related to the magnitude of compressive residual stress imply different effects. Laser shot diameter ranks first, followed by pulse width and laser power in terms of their effects on the magnitude of compressive residual stress. The best combination of levels is given by the levels (3, 3, 2). The optimal result was confirmed with a superior ultimate surface residual compressive stress of 125MP.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

692-696

Citation:

Online since:

December 2007

Export:

Price:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.E. Rankin, M.R. Hill and L.A. Hackel: Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 349 (2003) No. 1-2, pp.279-291.

Google Scholar

[2] G. Hammersley, L.A. Hackel and F. Harris: Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Vol. 34 (2000) No. 4-6, pp.327-337.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Gomez-Rosas, C. Rubio-Gonzalez and J.L. Ocana: Applied Surface Science, Vol. 252 (2005) No. 4, pp.883-887.

Google Scholar

[4] Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen: ABAQUS user's manual. version6. 4, (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] A.G. Olabi, G. Canalino, K.Y. Benyaunis and M.S.J. Hashmi: Advance in Engineering Software, Vol. 37 (2006) No. 10, pp.643-648.

Google Scholar

[6] L.K. Pan, C.C. Wang, Y.C. Hsiao and K.C. Ho: Optica&Laser Technology, Vol. 37 (2005) No. 1, pp.33-42.

Google Scholar

[7] C.H. Li, M.J. Tsai and C.D. Yang: Optica&Laser Technology, Vol. 39 (2007) No. 4, pp.786-795.

Google Scholar

[8] C.W. Chang, C.P. Kuo: International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, Vol. 47 (2007) No. 1, pp.141-147.

Google Scholar

[9] C. Liu, Y.L. Yao: Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 4 (2002) No. 1, pp.52-66.

Google Scholar

[10] J.L. Ocana, M. Morales, C. Molpeceres, J. Torres: Applied Surface Science, Vol. 238 (2004) No. 1-4, pp.242-248.

Google Scholar

[11] MINITAB statistical software Release 14-Meet MINITAB, (2003).

Google Scholar