Modeling and Multi-Response Optimization on WEDM Ti6Al4V

Article Preview

Abstract:

Wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) is a material removal process of electrically conductive materials by the thermo-electric source of energy which is extensively used in machining of materials for a highly precision productivity. This work presents the machining of titanium alloy (TI-6AL-4V) using WEDM with a brass wire diameter of 0.25mm.The objective of this work is to study the influence of three machining parameters, namely peak current (IP), feed rate (FC) and wire tension (WT) to cutting speed and surface roughness. Response Surface Methodology was used to develop second order model in order to predict cutting rate and surface roughness responses. The results showed that the average percentage error between the predicted and experimental value for both models was less than 2%.Furthermore, the developed models were used for multiple-response optimization by desirability function approach to determine the optimum machining parameters. These optimized machining parameters are validated experimentally, and it is observed that the response values are in good agreement with the predicted values.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

123-129

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.B. Saedon, Paul Ding J. R, M.S.M. Shawal, H. Husain and M.S. Meon, Advanced Materials Research Vol. 701 (2013) pp.349-353.

Google Scholar

[2] Sateesh Kumar Reddy K (2012), International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering &Technology Volume 1, Issue 3 ISSN: 2278 – 1323.

Google Scholar

[3] Saurav D, Siba MS (2010), Int J EngSci Technology 2(5): 162–183.

Google Scholar

[4] Vamsi Krishna Pasam (2010). J. of the Braz. Soc. of Mech. Sci. &Eng April-June 2010, Vol. XXXII, No. 2 / 109.

Google Scholar

[5] J.B. Saedon, S.L. Soo, D.K. Aspinwall, A. Barnacle, N.H. Saad, Procedia Engineering, Volume 41, 2012, p.1674–1683.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.367

Google Scholar

[6] Derringer G, Suich R, (1980) J QualTechnol 12(4): 214–219.

Google Scholar

[7] Montgomery DC (2001). Wiley, New York.

Google Scholar