Design Evaluation Method for Design Engineer in Manufacturing Industries Using Integrated Rough-Grey Analysis Approach

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to remain competitive in today’s technologically driven world, the faster and more efficient development of innovative products has become the focus for manufacturing companies. In tandem with this, design evaluation plays a critical role in the early phases of product development, because it has significant impact on the downstream development processes as well as on the success of the product being developed. Owing to the pressure of primary factors, such as customer expectations, technical specifications and cost and time constraints, designers have to adopt various techniques for evaluating design alternatives in order to make the right decisions as early as possible. In this work, a new methodology for design evaluation has been developed. The preliminary stage quantifies all the criteria from different viewpoints through the process of scale of “Weighting criteria”. The next stage uses a modified Rough-Grey Analysis to obtain the alternatives weighting or ranking of the alternatives. This method will enable designers to make better-informed decisions before finalising their choice. Case example from industry is presented to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed methodology. The result of the example shows that this new method provides an alternative to existing methods of design evaluation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1052-1056

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

[1] F. M. Turan, Omar, B., The Integration of HOQ and Fuzzy-AHP for Design Concept Evaluation, Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 315, pp.25-29, (2013).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.315.25

Google Scholar

[2] F. M. Turan, Omar, B., In situ design evaluation for product life cycle management using Fuzzy-AHP approach, in International Conference on Applications and Design in Mechanical Engineering (ICADME 2012), Penang, Malaysia, (2012).

Google Scholar

[3] S. Liu, Boyle, I. M., Engineering design: perspectives, challenges, and recent advances, Journal of Engineering Design, vol. 20, pp.7-19, (2009).

Google Scholar

[4] S. K. Chandrasegaran, Ramani, K., Sriram, R. D., Horváth, I., Bernard, A., Harik, R. F., Gao, W., The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems, Computer-Aided Design, vol. 45, pp.204-228, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2012.08.006

Google Scholar

[5] M. J. Scott, Quantifying Certainty in Design Decisions: Examining AHP, in ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences (DETC2002), (2002).

Google Scholar