Antibacterial Activity of Different Biomass Components of Cerbera odollam and their Potential to Be Used as New Preservative for Wood Based Products

Article Preview

Abstract:

Cerbera odollam’s tree parts were extracted with methanol and further fractionated using n-hexane, ethyl acetate and ethanol, followed by antibacterial assay against Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Hexane soluble parts from flower, fruit, leaf, wood, bark and ethyl acetate soluble part from bark showed antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis. Hexane soluble parts from leaf and bark and ethyl acetate soluble parts from wood showed antibacterial activity against Bacillus licheniformis. All fractions appeared ineffective on Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Screened extracts were analysed using FTIR. Experiments were continued with impregnation of methanolic extracts of Cerbera odollam into Melamine-urea formaldehyde (MUF) particleboards, Phenol-resorcinol formaldehyde (PRF) particleboards and solid wood samples followed by exposure to wood-boring beetles and natural decaying.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1040-1044

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.V. Tung, in: Know the Wayside Trees of Malaysia: Broadleaves 2, Volume 4, Media Kelisa. Selangor, Malaysia (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Gaillard, A. Krishnamoorthy, F. Bevalot, in: Journal of Ethnopharmacology 95, 123–126 (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] S. Laphookhieo, S. Cheenpracha, C. Karalai, S. Chantrapromma, Y. Rat-a-pa, C. Ponglimanont, K. Chantrapromma, in: Phytochemistry 65, 507 – 510 (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2003.10.019

Google Scholar

[4] K. K. Chen, F. A. Steldt, in: Journal of Pharmacology & Expert Therapy 76, 167 (1942).

Google Scholar

[5] M. T. T. Hien, C. Navarro-Delmasure, T. Vy, in: Journal of Ethnopharmacology 34, 201-206 (1991).

Google Scholar

[6] R. A. Rahman, A. Kadri, I. M. Said, in: Proceeding of Tropical Natural Resource Symposium, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia (1993).

Google Scholar

[7] G. Nemli, E. D. Gezer, S. Yıldız, A. Temiz and A. Aydın, in: Bioresource Technology 97, 2059–2064 (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.09.013

Google Scholar

[8] F. Kawamura, S. Ohara, A. Nishida, In: Holzforschung 58, 189 – 192 (2004).

Google Scholar

[9] S. Dash, L. K. Nath, S. Bhise, N. Bhuyan, in: Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 4 (1), 341-347 (2005).

Google Scholar

[10] J. H. Muyonga, C. G. B. Cole, K. G. Duodu, in: Food Chemistry 86, 325–332 (2004).

Google Scholar

[11] G. A. Ayoola, A. D. Folawewo, S. A. Adesegun, O. O. Abioro, A. A. Adepoju-Bello, H. A. B. Coker, in: African Journal of Plant Science 2 (9), pp.124-128 (2008).

Google Scholar

[12] D. P. Kamdem, in: Forest Product Journal 44 (1), 30 – 32 (1994).

Google Scholar

[13] BS EN 47, in: British Standard 1 – 24 (2005).

Google Scholar

[14] BS 1982-2, in: British Standards 1 – 10 (1990).

Google Scholar

[15] R. E. W. Hancock, in: Clinical Infectious Diseases 27, S93–S99 (1998).

Google Scholar

[16] A. R. Koroch, H. R. Juliani, J. A. Zygadlo, in: Flavours and Fragrances, pp.87-115 (2007).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-49339-6_5

Google Scholar