A Concept for the Dynamic Adjustment of Maintenance Intervals by Analysing Heterogeneous Data

Article Preview

Abstract:

Efficient operation and maintenance processes are important factors to reduce the operating costs of industrial facilities and components. Therefore, both research and industry developed maintenance strategies ranging from fixed time intervals to condition-based activities. However, due to unpredictable events, disturbances and unknown processing times for maintenance activities, many strategies do not meet the requirements of real-world industrial systems. In this paper, a new data-driven concept is presented where data analysis is used to support the dynamic adjustments of maintenance intervals. An overall strategy is developed in which the analysis of data is an integral part for standard maintenance processes, considering their particular workflow and their constraints. The analysed data come from different systems such as Enterprise Resource Planning, Condition Monitoring Systems, and internal service logs of the components or from maintenance activities. The concept encompasses the aligned application of different methods for aggregating these data and for predicting the component’s condition and its remaining useful life. In particular, it is exemplarily shown how the Weibull distribution, the Wiener process, and neural networks are combined to support decisions regarding the dynamic adjustment of the maintenance intervals in industrial facilities. This leads to a better utilisation of components, avoids failures and breakdowns and saves cost. The capability and applicability of these methods is illustrated by applying them to generators of an offshore wind farm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

507-515

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Manzini, A. Regattieri, H. Pham, E. Ferrari, Maintenance for Industrial Systems, Springer-Verlag, London, (2010).

Google Scholar

[2] R. K. Mobley, Introduction to the theory and practice of maintenance, in: R. K. Mobley, L. R. Higgins und D. J. Wikoff (Eds. ): Maintenance engineering handbook, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2008, p.1. 9-1. 21.

Google Scholar

[3] Maintenance – Maintenance terminology, Trilingual version EN 13306: (2010).

Google Scholar

[4] F. Ryll, C. Freund, Grundlagen der Instandhaltung, in: M Schenk (Eds. ) Instandhaltung technischer Systeme, Methoden und Werkzeuge zur Gewährleistung eines sicheren und wirtschaftlichen Anlagenbetriebs, Springer, Heidelberg, 2010, pp.23-101.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03949-2

Google Scholar

[5] C. Soares, Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul, in: Gas Turbines - A Handbook of Air, Land and Sea Applications, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2015, p.670.

Google Scholar

[6] A.S.B. Tam, W.M. Chan, J.W.H. Price, Optimal maintenance intervals for a multi-component system, Production Planning & Control, 17 (2006) 769-779.

DOI: 10.1080/09537280600834452

Google Scholar

[7] A. Jardine, D. Lin, D. Banjevic, A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 20 (2006) 1483–1510.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012

Google Scholar

[8] C. Chareonsuk, N. Nagarur, M.T. Tabucanon, A multicriteria approach to the selection of preventive maintenance intervals, International Journal of Production Economics 49 (1997) 55–64.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(96)00113-2

Google Scholar

[9] J.P. Brans, P.H. Vincke, B. Mareschal, How to select and how to rank project: The PROMETHEE method, European J. Oper. Res. 24 (1988) 228-238.

DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5

Google Scholar

[10] Y. -L. Jin, Z. -H. Jiang, W. -R. Hou, Integrating flexible-interval preventive maintenance planning with production scheduling, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 22 (2009) 1089–1101.

DOI: 10.1080/09511920903207449

Google Scholar

[11] J.J. Nielsen, J. D. Sørensen, On risk-based operation and maintenance of offshore wind turbine components, Reliability Engineering & System Safety 96. 1 (2011) 218-229.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.07.007

Google Scholar

[12] F. Ding, T. Zhigang, Opportunistic maintenance for wind farms considering multi-level imperfect maintenance thresholds, Renewable Energy 45 (2012) 175-182.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.02.030

Google Scholar

[13] A. Kusiak, Z. Zhang, A. Verma, Prediction, operations, and condition monitoring in wind energy, Energy 60 (2013) 1-12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.07.051

Google Scholar

[14] A. van Horenbeek, L. Pintelon, A dynamic predictive maintenance policy for complex multi-component systems, Reliability Engineering & System Safety 120 (2013) 39-50.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.029

Google Scholar

[15] K.S. Moghaddam, Multi-objective preventive maintenance and replacement scheduling in a manufacturing system using goal programming, International Journal of Production Economics 146 (2) (2013) 704-716.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.027

Google Scholar

[16] A. Jasbir, Introduction to Optimum Design, third ed., Elsevier, San Diego, (2011).

Google Scholar

[17] F.T. Wu, C. -C. Wang, J. -H. Liu, C. -M. Chang, Y. -P. Lee, Construction of Wind Turbine Bearing Vibration Monitoring and Performance Assessment System, Journal of Signal and Information Processing 4. 04 (2013) 430-438.

DOI: 10.4236/jsip.2013.44055

Google Scholar

[18] J. Geng, X. Tian, M. Bai, X. Jia, X. Liu, A design method for three-dimensional maintenance, repair and overhaul job card of complex products, Computers in Industry 65 (1) (2014) 200-209.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2013.08.008

Google Scholar

[19] Y. Sinha, J.A. Steel, A progressive study into offshore wind farm maintenance optimisation using risk based failure analysis, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 42 (2015) 735-742.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.087

Google Scholar

[20] C. Gundegjerdea, I.B. Halvorsena, E.E. Halvorsen-Weare, L.M. Hvattuma, L.M. Nonåsc, A stochastic fleet size and mix model for maintenance operations at offshore wind farms, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 52 (2015) 74-92.

DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.01.005

Google Scholar

[21] M. Lewandowski, S. Oelker, Towards Autonomous Control in Maintenance and Spare Part Logistics - Challenges and Opportunities for Preacting Maintenance Concepts, in: K. -D. Thoben, M. Busse, B. Denkena, J. Gausemeier (Eds. ): Conference Proceeding of 2nd International Conference on System-Integrated Intelligence. Challenges for Product and Production Engineering, Bremen, 2014, pp.331-338.

DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2014.09.087

Google Scholar

[22] J.Z. Sikorska, M. Hodkiewicz, L. Ma, Prognostic modelling options for remaining useful life estimation by industry, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 25 (5) (2011) 1803–1836.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.11.018

Google Scholar

[23] H. Rinne, The Weibull Distribution: A Handbook, CRC Press, (2008).

Google Scholar

[24] P. E. Kloeden, E. Platen, Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1999).

Google Scholar

[25] D. Kriesel, Ein kleiner Überblick über Neuronale Netze, 2007, Information on http: /www. dkriesel. com/ [30. 03. 2015].

Google Scholar