Surface Tension Analysis of Cost-Effective Paraffin Wax and Water Flow Simulation for Microfluidic Device

Article Preview

Abstract:

In microfluidic devices, the most important aspect has to be considered for the manufacturing process is the material suitability and geometric design. Among the materials studied, paraffin wax has never been tested and it is proposed as the new approach in this paper for patterning the microchannels. Furthermore, contact angle analysis of the paraffin wax was also studied. Based on the contact angle measurements; the hydrophobicity and surface tension of paraffin wax were analyzed. From the finding, it shows that paraffin wax has a low surface tension and high hydrophobicity. Then, several microchannels design was simulated using COMSOL multiphysics 4.2 software in order to find the optimized geometry. It involves a study of different shape, diameter, length, and angle of microchannels design, and its influence on the water flow velocity. From the simulation results, an optimize microchannels design was obtained consists of 1000 μm channels diameter, 1000 μm inlet channel length, 1.0 cm outlet channels length, and 110o inlet channel angle with water flow velocity of 2.3cm/s. Further study could be done to improve the finding of properties and geometric suitability for microfluidic device.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

773-777

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Tabeling, Introduction to Microfluidics, OUP Oxford, 2005.

Google Scholar

[2] B. Yang and Q. Lin, Compliance-Based Latchable Microfluidic Actuators Using a Paraffin Wax, in: Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, MEMS 2006 Istanbul, 19th IEEE International Conference (2006) 738-741.

DOI: 10.1109/memsys.2006.1627905

Google Scholar

[3] S.G. Kandlikar, S. Garimella, D. Li, S. Colin and M.R. King, Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in Minichannels and Microchannels, first ed., Elsevier, USA, 2006.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044527-4/50001-3

Google Scholar

[4] W.A. Zisman, Relation of the Equilibrium Contact Angle to Liquid and Solid Constitution in: Contact Angle, Wettability, and Adhesion, American Chemical Society (1946) 1-5.

DOI: 10.1021/ba-1964-0043.ch001

Google Scholar

[5] J.E. Mark, Physical Properties of Polymer Handbook, Springer, 2007.

Google Scholar

[6] W. Chen, A.Y. Fadeev, M.C. Hsieh, D. Öner, J.P. Youngblood, and T.J. McCarthy, Ultrahydrophobic and ultralyophobic surfaces: some comments and examples, Langmuir 15 (1999) 3395-3399.

DOI: 10.1021/la990074s

Google Scholar

[7] J. Bico, C. Marzolin, and D. Quere, Pearl drops, Europhys. Lett. 47 (1999) 220.

DOI: 10.1209/epl/i1999-00548-y

Google Scholar

[8] K. Watanabe, Yanuar and H. Udagawa, Drag reduction of Newtonian fluid in a circular pipe with highly water-repellent wall, J. Fluid Mech. 381 (1999) 225.

DOI: 10.1017/s0022112098003747

Google Scholar

[9] D.C. Tretheway and C.D. Meinhart, Apparent fluid slip at hydrophobic microchannel walls, Phys. Fluids 14 (2002) L9.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1432696

Google Scholar

[10] S. Kumar Ranjith, B.S.V. Patnaik, S. Vedantam, Hydrodynamics of the Developing Region in Hydrophobic Microchannels: A Dissipative Particle Dynamics Study, ARVIX, 2012.

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.87.033303

Google Scholar

[11] T. Bayraktar, S.B. Pidugu, Characterization of liquid flows in microfluidic systems, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49 (2006) 815-824.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.11.007

Google Scholar

[12] H.A. Stone, Microfluidics: Basic Issues, Applications, and Challenges, AIChE Journal (2001) 1250-1254.

Google Scholar