Evaluation of Combined Treatments of Natural Fibers: Kenaf, Abaca and Oil Palm Fibers Using Micromechanical and SEM Methods

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the results of three different fibers, Kenaf (hibiscus cannabinus), oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) and abaca (Musa textilis) which were treated using 5 different types of surface treatments namely sodium hydroxide for 24 hours, glycidoxypropyltrimethoxy-silane for 24 hours, NaOH followed by Silane (each 24 hours), NaOH followed by Silane (each 12 hours) and NaOH followed by Silane (each 6 hours). The mechanical strength of the fibers were then studied and compared to the untreated fibers. The highest strength was given by the fibers treated with NaOH followed by the combined treatments and the lowest were the fibers treated with silane. Also the bonding strength between the fibers and unsaturated polyester resin were then evaluated using micro droplet pull out tests. It was proven that all the treatments improved on the bonding strength. The highest was silane followed by NaOH. For the combined treatments it was found that the highest IFSS was given by the lowest treatment duration at 6 hours, due to the alkali nature of NaOH corroding the fibers which were then filled with silane, thus losing the ability to properly bond with the resin. The samples were also then characterized using a SEM to check the surface morphology which revealed that the NaOH reduced the diameter by removing impurities and lignin, thus increasing the aspect ratio. While silane coats the surface, increases the diameter and reduces the aspect ratio. Keywords. Kenaf, Abaca, OPF, Chemical Treatment, Bonding Strength, Droplet Test, SEM

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 912-914)

Pages:

1932-1939

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Joshi, S. V., Drzal, L. T., Mohanty, A. K., & Arora, S. Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing (2004), Vol 35 (3), 371-376.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016

Google Scholar

[2] Aji, I. S., Sapuan, S. M., Zainudin, E. S., & Abdan, K. Kenaf fibres as reinforcement for polymeric composites: a review. International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering 2009, 4(3), 239-248.

Google Scholar

[3] Wambua, P., Ivens, J., & Verpoest, I. Natural fibres: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics? Composites Science and Technology 2003, 63(9), 1259-1264.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(03)00096-4

Google Scholar

[4] S. Sreenivasan, S. Sulaiman, B. T. H. T. Baharudin, M. K. A. Ariffin and K. Abdan, (2013, September) Recent Developments of Kenaf Fiber Rein-forced Thermoset Composites: A Review Materials Research Innovations 2013, 17 (2), S2-1-S2-11.

DOI: 10.1179/1432891713z.000000000312

Google Scholar

[5] Li, X., Panigrahi, S., & Tabil, L. G. Chemical Treatments of Natural Fiber for Use in Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composites: A Review. Journal of Polymer Environment 2007, 15(1), 25-33.

DOI: 10.1007/s10924-006-0042-3

Google Scholar

[6] Agrawal , R., Saxena, N. S., Sharma, K. B., Thomas, S., & Sreekala, M. S. Activation energy and crystallization kinetics of untreated and treated oil palm fibre reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites. Materials Science and Engineering: A 2000, 77-82.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(99)00556-0

Google Scholar

[7] Yanjun, X., Callum, H. A., Zefang, X., Holger, M., & Carsten, M Silane coupling agents used for natural fiber/polymer composites: A review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2010, 41(7), 806-819.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.005

Google Scholar

[8] Sawpan, M. A., Pickering, K. L., & Fernyhough, A. (2011, September). Effect of fibre treatments on interfacial shear strength of hemp fibre reinforced polylactide and unsaturated polyester composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2011, 42(9), 1189-1196.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.05.003

Google Scholar

[9] Cho , D., Lee, H. S., & Han, S. O. Effect of Fiber Surface Modification on the Interfacial and Mechanical Properties of Kenaf Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic and Thermosetting Polymer Composites. Composite Interfaces 2009, 16(7-9), 711-729.

DOI: 10.1163/092764409x12477427307537

Google Scholar

[10] Sgriccia, N., Hawley, M. C., & Misra, M. Characterization of natural fiber surfaces and natural fiber composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2008, 39(10), 1632-1637.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.007

Google Scholar

[11] Park, J. -M., Son, T. Q., Jung, J. -G., & Hwang, B. -S. Interfacial evaluation of single Ramie and Kenaf fiber/epoxy resin composites using micromechanical test and nondestructive acoustic emission. Composite Interfaces 2012, 13(2-3), 105-129.

DOI: 10.1163/156855406775997051

Google Scholar

[12] Sockalingam, S., & Nilakantan, G. Fiber-Matrix Interface Characterization through the Microbond Test. International Journal of Aeronautical & Space Science 2012, 13(3), 282-295.

DOI: 10.5139/ijass.2012.13.3.282

Google Scholar

[13] Zhandarov, S., & Mäder, E. Characterization of fiber/matrix interface strength: applicability of different tests, approaches and parameters. Composites Science and Technology 2005, 65(1), 149-160.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.003

Google Scholar

[14] Sreekala M.S. and Thomas S., Utilization Of Short Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fiber (OPEFB) As A Reinforcement In Phenol-Formaldehyde Resins: Studies On Mechanical Properties, Journal of Polymer Engineering 1996, 16(4), 265–294.

DOI: 10.1515/polyeng.1996.16.4.265

Google Scholar

[15] Hsueh C.H., Young's modulus of unidirectional discontinuous-fiber composites, Composites Science and Technology 2000, 60, 2671–2680.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(00)00128-7

Google Scholar

[16] Puglia, D. , Terenzi, A., Barbosa S. E. & Kenny J. M. Polypropylene-natural fibre composites. Analysis of fibre structure modification during compounding and its influence on the final properties, Composite Interfaces, 2008, 15(2-3), 111-129.

DOI: 10.1163/156855408783810849

Google Scholar

[17] Khalil, H. A., Alwani, S. M., & Mohd Omar, A. K. Chemical Composition, Anatomy, Lignin Distribution, And Cell Wall Structure Of Malaysian Plant Waste Fibers. Bioresources 2006, 1(2), 220-232.

DOI: 10.15376/biores.1.2.220-232

Google Scholar

[18] Mohanty, A. K., Misra, M., & Drzal, L. T. Surface modifications of natural fibers and performance of the resulting biocomposites: An overview. Composite Interfaces 2001, 8(5), 313-343.

DOI: 10.1163/156855401753255422

Google Scholar