Development of Craniofacial Implants Produced by Metal Injection Molding of Titanium Alloy Using Novel Binder System Based on Palm Oil

Article Preview

Abstract:

Metal Injection Molding (MIM) is a cost-effective technique for producing small, complex, precision parts in high volumes. MIM consists of four main processing steps: mixing, injection molding, debinding and sintering. In the mixing step, the powder titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) medical grade is mixed with a binder system based on palm stearin to form a homogeneous feedstock. The rheological studies of the feedstock have been determined properly in order to success during injection into injection molding machine. After molding, the binder holds the particles in place. The binder systems then have to be removed completely through debinding step. Any contamination of the binder systems will affect the final properties of the parts. During debinding step, solvent extraction debinding has been used to remove partly of the binder systems. The debound part is then sintered at high temperature under control atmosphere furnace. The properties of the sintered craniofacial implants then was measured and compared. The sintered craniofacial implants also then were determined in term of in-vitro cytotoxicity study using mouse fibroblast lines L-929. The results show that the sintered craniofacial implants of titanium alloy produced by MIM fullfill the in-vitro cytotoxicity test.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

247-252

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

[1] Randall M. G. and Animesh B. (1997), Injection Molding of Metal and Ceramics, MPIF, Princeton, New Jersey.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Liu et. al, (2005), Design of Powder Metallurgy Titanium Alloy and Composites, Materials Science and Engineering, A 418 (2006) 25-35.

Google Scholar

[3] H.J. Rack and J.I. Qazi (2005), Titanium Alloy for Biomedical Application, Materials Science and Engineering, C to be published.

Google Scholar

[4] Norhamidi M., Muhammad H. I., Nor H. M. N., Ahmad K. A. M. I. and Jaafar S., Improtance of Rheological Behaviour in Metal Injection Moulding for Prediction of Injected Parts, ICAST 2000, pg. 169-174.

Google Scholar

[5] Norhamidi M., Iriany, Ahmad K. A. M. I. and Jaafar S., Rheological Study of Feedstock for Metal Injection Molding Process, ICAST 2000, pg. 97-106.

Google Scholar

[6] Hanks CT, Wataha JC & Sun Z. 1996., In Vitro Models of Biocompatibility,: A review. Dental Materials 12: 186-193.

DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80020-0

Google Scholar

[7] Ramires PA, Romito A, Cosentino F & Milella E. 2001., The Influence of Titania/Hydroxyapatite Composite Coatings on In Vitro Osteoblast Behavior, Biomaterials 22: 1467-1474.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00269-6

Google Scholar

[8] K. Jamuna-Thevi , F.A. Zakaria , R. Othman , & S. Muhamad (2009).

Google Scholar