Mechanical Characterization of Conventional and Non-Conventional Sintering Methods of Commercial and Lab-Synthesized Y-TZP Zirconia for Dental Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ceramics for dental applications have become increasingly important in the last decades. Particularly, the introduction of yttria-stabilized zirconia tetragonal polycrystalline (Y-TZP) materials as an alternative to the manufacturing of dental implants and prosthesis has provided a powerful tool to meet the demands required for these replacements in terms of biocompatibility, toughness, hardness and optical properties. Several commercial Y-TZP materials are currently available on the market and strong efforts in research and development facilities are being carried out to improve processing of Y-TZP to fully consolidate odontological pieces. Novel processing methods for ceramic powder sintering, including Y-TZP, aim to reduce processing times and production costs significantly, while maintaining or even improving the resulting microstructure and mechanical properties of the material. One of these methods includes microwave sintering. The purpose of this study is to characterize and compare the resulting properties of Y-TZP materials after conventional sintering and the non-conventional method of microwave heating. In this work one commercial material and one laboratory-synthesized Y-TZP powder are considered. The results suggest that microwave sintering results, generally, in better mechanical properties of the material in terms of hardness and fracture toughness than conventional sintering.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

151-156

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. Piconi, G. Maccauro, Zirconia as a Ceramic Biomaterial. Biomaterials, 20 (1999) 1‐25.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00010-6

Google Scholar

[2] M. Guazzato, M. Albakry, S. Ringer, M. Swain, Strength, Fracture Toughness and Microstructure of a Selection of All-Ceramic Materials. Dental Materials, 20 (2004) 449-456.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002

Google Scholar

[3] R. M. McMeeking, A. G. Evans, Mechanics of Transformation-Toughening in Brittle Materials. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 65 (1982) 242–246.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10426.x

Google Scholar

[4] R. Benavente, Estudio de Materiales con Coeficiente de Dilatación Controlado Sinterizados por Técnicas No-Convencionales para Aplicaciones Espaciales, 2013, Master Thesis, Instituto de Tecnología de Materiales, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.

DOI: 10.4995/thesis/10251/49358

Google Scholar

[5] M. Oghbaei, O. Mirzaee, Microwave versus Conventional Sintering: A Review of Fundamentals, Advantages and Applications. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 494 (2010) 175-189.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.01.068

Google Scholar

[6] K. Niihara, R. Morena, D. P. H. Hasselman, Evaluation of KIC of Brittle Solids by the Indentation Method with Low Crack-to-Indentation Ratios. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 1 (1982) 13-16.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00724706

Google Scholar

[7] A. Borrell, M. D. Salvador, F. Peñaranda-Foix, J.M. Cátala-Civera, Microwave Sintering of Zirconia Materials: Mechanical and Microstructural Properties. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 10 (2013) 313-320.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2011.02741.x

Google Scholar

[8] A. Borrell, M. D. Salvador, E. Rayón, F. Peñaranda-Foix, Improvement of Microstructural Properties of 3Y-TZP Materials by Conventional and Non-Conventional Sintering Techniques. Ceramics International, 38 (2012) 39-43.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.06.035

Google Scholar

[9] J. R. Kelly, I. Denry, Stabilized Zirconia as a Structural Ceramic: An Overview. Dental Materials, 24 (2008) 289-298.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.005

Google Scholar

[10] S. Zinelis, A. Thomas, K. Syres, N. Silikas, G. Eliades, Surface Characterization of Zirconia Implants. Dental Materials, 26 (2010) 295-305.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.079

Google Scholar