Analytical and Numerical Investigation of Fatigue Crack Growth in Aluminum Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

The work presents a summary of previous studies on fatigue crack propagation within various Aluminum alloys. The effective characteristics on crack growth are first highlighted and the influence of surface engineering such as polishing, shot peening and skimming to enhance the failure resistance are discussed. Several different existing developed models for predicting the rate of crack propagation are compared in terms of incorporated effective parameters. Finally numerical and computational analyses as the accurate, fast and cheap methods which have attracted the Engineers’ interest are reviewed and compared with other methods.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 462-463)

Pages:

1050-1055

Citation:

Online since:

January 2011

Export:

Price:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Ali, Improving the fatigue life of aircraft components by using surface engineering. PhD Thesis in Mechanical Engineering, The university of Sheffield: Sheffield (2005), p.238.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Ali, X. An, C.A. Rodopoulous, M.W. Brown, P. O' Hara, A. Levers and S. Gardiner: Int J FatigVol. 29 (2007), p.1531.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Ali, M.W. Brown, C.A. Rodopoulos and S. Gardiner: J Fail Anal PrevVol. 6(4) (2006), p.41.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Fratinia and B. Zuccarellob: Int J Mach Tool Manufac Vol. 46 (2006), p.611.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Scialpi, L.A.C. De Filippis and P. Cavaliere: Mater Des Vol. 28 (2007), p.1124.

Google Scholar

[6] P. Staron, M. Kocak, S. Williams and A. Wescott: Physica B Vol. 350 (2004), p. e491.

Google Scholar

[7] P. Cavaliere and F. Panella: J Mater Process TechVol. 206 (2008), p.249.

Google Scholar

[8] G. Bussu and P.E. Irving: Int J Fatig Vol. 25 (2003), p.77.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Lomolinoa, R. Tovob and J. Dos Santos: Int J FatigVol. 27 (2005), p.305.

Google Scholar

[10] C.M. Chen and R. Kovacevic: Int J Mach Tool ManufactVol. 44 (2004), p.1205.

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Hatsukade, T. Takahashi, T. Yasui, M. Tsubaki, M. Fukumono and S. Tanaka: Physica C Vol. 463-465 (2007), p.1038.

DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2007.01.072

Google Scholar

[12] L. Ceschini, I. Boromei, G. Minak, A. Morri and F. Tarterini: Compos Sci Tech Vol. 67 (2007), p.605.

Google Scholar

[13] H. Lombard, D.G. Hattingh, A. Steuwer and M.N. James: Eng Frac Mech Vol. 75 (2008), p.341.

Google Scholar

[14] D. Booth and I. Sinclair: Mater Sci Forum(2002), p.1671.

Google Scholar

[15] K.V. Jata, K.K. Sankaran and J.J. Ruschau: Metallurgical and Materials Transaction A Vol. 31(9) (2000), p.2181.

Google Scholar

[16] C.G. Rhodes, M.W. Mahoney and W.H. Bingel: Scripta MaterVol. 36(1) (1997), p.69.

Google Scholar

[17] A. Ali, M.W. Brown and C.A. Rodopoulous: Int J FatigVol. 30 (2008), p. (2030).

Google Scholar

[18] P. Cavaliere, G.L. Rossi, R. Di Sante and M. Moretti: Int J FatigVol. 30 (2008), p.198.

Google Scholar

[19] M.B. Prime, T. Gnaupel-Herold, J.A. Baumann, R.J. Lederich, D.M. Bowden and R.J. Sebring: Acta Materialia Vol. 54 (2006), p.4013.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.034

Google Scholar

[20] H. Wang, F.G. Buchholz, H.A. Richard, S. Jagg and B. Scholtes: Comput Mater SciVol. 16 (1999), p.104.

Google Scholar

[21] H. Alizadeh, S. Simandjutak, D. Smith and M. Pavier: Int J Fatig Vol. 29 (2007), p.1711.

Google Scholar

[22] A. F. Golestaneh, A. Ali and M. Zadeh: Mater Des Vol. 30 (2009), p.2928.

Google Scholar

[23] A.R. Ingraffea, G. Blandford and J.A. Liggett: In Fourteenth National Symposium on Fracture, ASTM STP (1987).

Google Scholar

[24] Z. Xiang, S.T. Lie, B. Wang and Z. Cen: Int J Pres Ves PipVol. 80 (2003), p.111.

Google Scholar

[25] A. F. Golestaneh, A. Ali, S.V. Wong, F. Mustapha and M. Zadeh: Simulation Vol. 85 (2009), p.45.

Google Scholar