IGSCC of Non-Sensitised Austenitic Stainless Steels in BWR Environment – Effect of Deformation Mode on Grain Boundary Susceptibility

Article Preview

Abstract:

Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking (IGSCC) of austenitic Stainless Steels (SS) in Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) environment is generic in nature in both the sensitised and the non-sensitized conditions. IGSCC in non-sensitized austenitic SS in the strain hardened condition has been reported without any grain boundary chromium depletion or impurity segregation. The present study ascertains the reason for IGSCC in BWR environment in non-sensitized condition and investigates the effect of nitrogen content in SS on the susceptibility to IGSCC. Two heats of type 304LN stainless steel with 0.08 and 0.16 wt. % nitrogen were used. Strain hardening was done by cross rolling at 200 °C to 20 % thickness reduction (warm rolling) to simulate the weld induced strain in constrained welds. Subsequently, Transmission Electron Microscopic (TEM) examination was carried out on the rolled SS. The deformation mode observed due to warm rolling was predominantly elongated twin and shear band (SB) formation in both the SS, terminating at the grain boundary regions. This resulted in higher stresses and strains making grain boundary susceptible to IGSCC. Presence of more dislocations at grain boundaries is a key feature for such enhancement in the susceptibility of non-sensitized SS to IGSCC. Formation of twins and SB occurred to a greater extent in the SS with higher nitrogen content indicating greater susceptibility to IGSCC in BWR environment. Crack growth studies done in simulated BWR environment at different Dissolved Oxygen (DO) levels showed higher crack growth rates in the SS with higher nitrogen content in the non-sensitised and strain hardened condition, confirming the higher susceptibility of SS with a higher level of nitrogen.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 702-703)

Pages:

685-688

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R.M. Horn, G.M. Gordon, F.P. Ford, R.L. Cowan, Nucl. Eng. Des. 174 (1997) 313 – 325.

Google Scholar

[2] K Gott, Cracking data base as a basis for risk informed inspection, in: Proc. 10th Int. Symp. on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water reactors, TMS, (2001).

Google Scholar

[3] R.E. Stoltz, J.B. Vander Sande, Metall Trans A 11 (1980) 1033-1037.

Google Scholar

[4] P. Mullner, C. Solenthaler, P. Uggowitzer, M.O. Speidel Mater Sci Eng A 164 (1993) 164-169.

Google Scholar

[5] G. Gavriljuk, H. Berns, C. Escher, N.I. Glavatskaya, A. Sozinov, Y.N. Petrov, Mater Sci Eng A, 271 (1999) 14-21.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(99)00272-5

Google Scholar

[6] A. Soussan, S. Degallaix, T. Magnin, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 142 (1991) 169-176.

Google Scholar

[7] J.W. Simmons, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 207 (1996) 159 – 169.

Google Scholar

[8] G.C. Palit, V. Kain, H.S. Gadiyar, Corrosion, 49 (1993) 979-991.

Google Scholar

[9] I. Olefjord, L. Wegrelius, Corros. Sci. 38 (1996) 1203 – 1220.

Google Scholar

[10] T.A. Mozhi, W.A. T Clark, K. Nishimoto, W.B. Johnson, D.D. Macdonald, Corrosion 41 (1985) 555 - 559.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Roychowdhury, V. Kain, M. Gupta, R.C. Prasad, Corros Sci 53 (2011) 1120 – 1129.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Blicharski, S. Dymek, M. Wrobel, J Mater Process Technol 53 (1995) 75-84.

Google Scholar

[13] Q. Xue, E.K. Cerreta, G.T. Gray III, Acta Mater 55 (2007) 691-704.

Google Scholar

[14] M.A. Meyers, Y.B. Xu, Q. Xue, M.T. Perez-Prado, T.R. McNelley, Acta Mater 51 (2003) 1307 – 1325.

Google Scholar

[15] S. Frechard, A. Redjaimia, E. Lach, A. Lichtenberger, Mater Sci Eng A 415 (2006) 219-224.

Google Scholar

[16] S. Roychowdhury, S. Neogy, M. Gupta, V. Kain, D. Srivastava, G.K. Dey, R.C. Prasad, Effect of test temperature and prior straining on the deformation mode of austenitic stainless steel during tensile testing, in: EPD Congress 2011, TMS 2011 119-126.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118495285.ch15

Google Scholar

[17] D.N. Wasnik, I.K. Gopalkrishnan, J.V. Yakhami, V. Kain, I. Samajdar, ISIJ Intern 43 (2003) 1581-1589.

Google Scholar

[18] W. Karlsen, G. Diego, B. Devrient, J Nucl Mater 406 (2010) 138-151.

Google Scholar